How News Reports and ESG Publication Financially Affect Firms

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

ESG has become a growing and integral part of company activities. Not only is it something investors now take into consideration when choosing stocks, but the question of a firm’s Environmental, Social and Governance awareness and actions has integrated itself into something as critical as some banks’ decisions to provide loans to a firm. While ESG used to be
just a “nice-to-have,” there is no denying that it is now a must-have for any company that wants to be a global market leader.

Many prior studies have focused on ESG ratings, the types of ESG information disclosed in annual reports and the effect of financial news on firms. The aim of this research is to take a deeper look at the effect of ESG on firms and find out whether different news feed and news publications concerning a company’s ESG activities and circumstances affect its value? Our research shows that there is a weakly significant effect of negative ESG-related news on firms in the window (–1, +1) and no significant reaction to positive news. This means that investors do not statistically significantly react to positive ESG news about firms. We examined 65 publicly traded companies from 7 different markets worldwide over the course of 13 years (from 2009 to 2021). We collected a total of 458 separate news articles from the S&P Global Market Intelligence platform –and classified them into positive and negative depending on the news. We ran OLS regressions of the data points together with financial control variables on a company’s CAR in a 5-, 3- and 2-day interval to check for the effect. No significant effect was reported.

About the authors

E. Anang

Author for correspondence.
Email: ericanang@hotmail.com

M. Vasiev

Email: vasievmp@hrbeu.edu.cn

Q. Wang

Email: 353712739@qq.com

References

  1. Engle R.E., Ng V.K. Measuring and testing the impact of news on volatility. The Journal of Finance. 1993;48(5):1749-1778. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1993.tb05127.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1993.tb05127.x
  2. As Boohoo prepares to announce its full-year results, investors are still focused on response to sweatshop slavery scandal. This is Money. Apr. 30, 2021. URL: https://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/investing/article-9530731/Boohoo-investors-focus-response-sweatshop-slavery-scandal.html
  3. Fedorova E., Afanasev D., Nersesyan R., Ledyaeva, S. Impact of non-financial information on key financial indicators of Russian companies. Zhurnal Novoi ekonomicheskoi assotsiatsii = Journal of the New Economic Association. 2020;(2):73-96. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.31737/2221-2264-2020-46-2-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31737/2221-2264-2020-46-2-4
  4. De Silva Lokuwaduge C., Heenetigala K. Integrating environmental, social and governance (ESG) disclosure for a sustainable development: An Australian study. Business Strategy and the Environment. 2017;26(4):438-450. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1927 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1927
  5. Weber O. Environmental, social and governance reporting in China. Business Strategy and the Environment. 2014;23(5):303-317. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1785 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1785
  6. Lanis R., Richardson G. A reply to corporate social responsibility and tax aggressiveness: A test of legitimacy theory. Social and Environmental Accountability Journal. 2016;36(1):92-93. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969160X.2016.1148975 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0969160X.2016.1148975
  7. Arayssi M. Jizi M., Tabaja H.H. The impact of board composition on the level of ESG disclosures in GCC countries. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal. 2020;11(1):137-161. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-05-2018-0136 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-05-2018-0136
  8. Sharma P., Panday P., Dangwal R.C. Determinants of environmental, social and corporate governance (ESG) disclosure: A study of Indian companies. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance. 2020;17(4):208-217. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41310-020-00085-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41310-020-00085-y
  9. Conca L., Manta F., Morrone D., Toma P. The impact of direct environmental, social, and governance reporting: Empirical evidence in European‐listed companies in the agri‐food sector. Business Strategy and the Environment. 2021;30(2):1080-1093. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2672 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2672
  10. Xiang Y., Birt J.L. Internet reporting, social media strategy and firm characteristics – an Australian study. Accounting Research Journal. 2021;34(1):43-75. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARJ-09-2018-0154 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/ARJ-09-2018-0154
  11. Bhattacharya S., Sharma D. Do environment, social and governance performance impact credit ratings: A study from India. International Journal of Ethics and Systems. 2019;35(3):466-484. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOES-09-2018-0130 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOES-09-2018-0130
  12. Mervelskemper L., Streit D. Enhancing market valuation of ESG performance: Is integrated reporting keeping its promise? Business Strategy and the Environment. 2017;26(4):536-549. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1935 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1935
  13. Maniora J. Is integrated reporting really the superior mechanism for the integration of ethics into the core business model? An empirical analysis. Journal of Business Ethics. 2017;140(4):755-786. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2874-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2874-z
  14. Landau A., Rochell J., Klein C., Zwergel B. Integrated reporting of environmental, social, and governance and financial data: Does the market value integrated reports? Business Strategy and the Environment. 2020;29(4):1750-1763. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2467 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2467
  15. Espahbodi L., Espahbodi R., Juma N., Westbrook A. Sustainability priorities, corporate strategy, and investor behavior. Review of Financial Economics. 2019;37(1):149-167. https://doi.org/10.1002/rfe.1052 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/rfe.1052
  16. Capelle-Blancard G., Petit A. Every little helps? ESG news and stock market reaction. Journal of Business Ethics. 2019;157(2):543-565. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3667-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3667-3
  17. Murashima M. Do investors’ reactions to CSR-related news communication differ by shareholder? An empirical analysis from Japan. Corporate Governance. 2016;20(5):781-796. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-11-2019-0346 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-11-2019-0346
  18. Seok J., Lee Y., Kim B.-D. Impact of CSR news reports on firm value. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics. 2020;32(3):644-663. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-06-2019-0352 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-06-2019-0352
  19. Krüger P. Corporate goodness and shareholder wealth. Journal of Financial Economics. 2015;115(2):304-329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2014.09.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2014.09.008
  20. S&P Global 1200. S&P Dow Jones Indices. URL: https://www.spglobal.com/spdji/en/indices/equity/sp-global-1200/#overview
  21. Hillmer S.C., Yu P.L. The market speed of adjustment to new information. Journal of Financial Economics. 1979;7(4):321-345. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(79)90002-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(79)90002-3
  22. Chang S.J., Chen S.-N. A study of call price behavior under a stationary return generating process. The Financial Review. 1989;24(3):335-354. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6288.1989.tb00346.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6288.1989.tb00346.x
  23. Krivin, Dmitry & Patton, Robert & Rose, Erica & Tabak, David. Determination of the appropriate event window length in individual stock event studies. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2003. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.466161 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.466161
  24. McWilliams A., Siegel D., Teoh S.H. Issues in the use of the event study methodology: A critical analysis of corporate social responsibility studies. Organizational Research Methods. 1999;2(4):340-365. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442819924 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/109442819924002
  25. Brown S.J., Warner J.B. Using daily stock returns: The case of event studies. Journal of Financial Economics. 1985;14(1):3-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(85)90042-X DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(85)90042-X
  26. Fyodorova E., Sayakhov R., Demin I., Afanasyev D. The influence of conference calls’ semantic characteristics on the company market performance: Text analysis. Russian Journal of Economics. 2019;5(3):297-320. https://doi.org/10.32609/j.ruje.5.47422 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32609/j.ruje.5.47422

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) 2022 Anang E., Vasiev M., Wang Q.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.