Social Norms and Cost of Equity: Empirical Examination in Indonesia

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

This paper provides evidence of the effect of social norms, as measured by sin stock status, on the cost of equity capital. We consider Indonesian publicly traded sin stocks that produce alcohol and tobacco. While previous studies focused on whether sin and saint stocks have different financing preferences, we examine how these companies are charged differently in terms of their cost of equity capital. Our research sample consists of companies listed on the Indonesian Stock Exchange from 2016 to 2020. Regression analysis proves that sin stock status has a significant influence on equity capital costs. There is an extra premium for sin stocks, as they are perceived to be riskier by investors in the market. Our results make a significant
contribution to the emerging literature on social norm-based investing, demonstrating a major impact on both corporate finance and investment management decisions. The study’s sample is restricted to publicly traded companies in Indonesia from 2016 to 2020, potentially limiting the generalizability of its findings to other countries or periods. Further research could broaden the scope of analysis and delve deeper into the factors that influence the cost of equity for sin stocks in various contexts.

About the authors

D. Cahyaningdyah

Universitas Negeri Semarang, Semarang, Indonesia

Author for correspondence.
Email: dcahyaningdyah@mail.unnes.ac.id

K. B Abiprayu

Universitas Negeri Semarang, Semarang, Indonesia

Email: krisbrantas@mail.unnes.ac.id

S. Ridloah

Universitas Negeri Semarang, Semarang, Indonesia

Email: siti.ridloah@mail.unnes.ac.id

E. A Wicaksari

Universitas Negeri Semarang

Email: erisa@mail.unnes.ac.id

References

  1. Hong H, Kacperczyk M. The price of sin: The effects of social norms on markets. J financ econ. 2009;93(1):15–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.09.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.09.001
  2. Berman B., ed. From ideas to assets: Investing wisely in intellectual property. John Wiley & Sons; 2001:672.
  3. Waxler C. Stocking Up on Sin: How to Crush the Market with Vice-Based Investing. John Wiley & Sons; 2004:256.
  4. Ahrens D. Investing in Vice: The Recession-Proof Portfolio of Booze, Bets, Bombs, and Butts. St. Martin’s Press; 2007:192.
  5. Durand RB, Koh SK, Limkriangkrai M. Saints versus Sinners. Does morality matter? Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money. 2013 Apr;24(1):166–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2012.12.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2012.12.002
  6. Merton RC. A Simple Model of Capital Market Equilibrium with Incomplete Information. The Journal of Finance. 1987;42(3):483-510. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1987.tb04565.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1987.tb04565.x
  7. Fabozzi F.J., Ma K.C., Oliphant B.J. Sin Stock Returns. The Journal of Portfolio Management. 2008;35(1):82–94. https://doi.org/10.3905/JPM.2008.35.1.82 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3905/JPM.2008.35.1.82
  8. Salaber J.M. The determinants of sin stock return: Evidence on the European market. In: Paris December 2007 Finance International Meeting AFFI-EUROFIDAI Paper. 2007. https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1071746 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1071746
  9. Chong J., Her M., Phillips GM. To sin or not to sin? Now that’s the question. Journal of Asset Management. 2006;6(6):406–417. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jam.2240191 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jam.2240191
  10. Areal N., Ceu Cortez M., Silva F. Investing in mutual funds: Does it pay to be a sinner or a saint in times of crisis? SSRN Electronic Journal. 2010. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1676391 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1676391
  11. Hoepner A.G., Zeume S. The dark enemy of responsible mutual funds: does the Vice Fund offer more financial virtue? SSRN eLibrary. 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1485846
  12. Liston D.P. Sin stock returns and investor sentiment. Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance. 2016;59:63–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2015.08.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2015.08.004
  13. Pratiwi P.D. Pengaruh Norma Sosial Terhadap Keputusan Pendanaan Perusahaan Sektor Non-Keuangan Yang Terdafatar di Bursa Efek Indonesia Periode 2008-2012. Universitas Gadjah Mada; 2014. (accessed on 30.06.2024) URL: https://etd.repository.ugm.ac.id/penelitian/detail/71277
  14. Fama E., French K. Industry costs of equity. Journal of Financial Economics. 1997;43(2):153-193. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(96)00896-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(96)00896-3
  15. Leventis S., Hasan I., Dedoulis E. The cost of sin: The effect of social norms on audit pricing. International Review of Financial Analysis. 2013;29:152–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2013.03.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2013.03.006
  16. Goss A., Roberts G.S. The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on the Cost of Bank Loans. Journal of Banking & Finance. 2009;35(7):1794-1810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2010.12.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2010.12.002
  17. Kim I., Venkatachalam M. Are Sin Stocks Paying the Price for Accounting Sins? Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance. 2011;26(2):415–442. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558X11401 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558X11401222
  18. Easton P. Use of forecasts of earnings to estimate and compare cost of capital across regimes. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting. 2006;33(3-4): 374–394. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5957.2006.00627.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5957.2006.00627.x
  19. Gebhardt W.R., Lee C.M.C., Swaminathan B. Toward an implied cost of capital. Journal of Accounting Research. 2001;39(1):135–176. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.00007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.00007
  20. Claus J., Thomas J. Equity premia as low as three percent? Evidence from analysts’ earnings forecasts for domestic and international stock markets. Journal of Finance. 2001;56(5):1629–1666. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00384 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00384
  21. Ohlson J.A., Carey W.P., Juettner-Nauroth B.E. Expected EPS and EPS Growth as Determinants of Value. Review of Accounting Studies.2005;10: 349–365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-005-1535-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-005-1535-3
  22. Boubakri N., Guedhami O., Mishra D., et al. Political connections and the cost of equity capital. Journal of Corporate Finance. 2012;18(3):541–559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2012.02.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2012.02.005
  23. Hu N., Chen H., Liu M. Religious atmosphere and the cost of equity capital: Evidence from China. China Journal of Accounting Research. 2018;11(2):151–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjar.2018.01.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjar.2018.01.001
  24. Blitz D., Swinkels L. Does excluding sin stocks cost performance? Journal of Sustainable Finance and Investment. 2023;13(4):1693–1710. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2021.1972789 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2021.1972789
  25. Han X., Li Y., Onishchenko O. Shunned stocks and market states. European Journal of Finance. 2022;28(7):705–717. https://doi.org/10.1080/1351847X.2021.2015699 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1351847X.2021.2015699
  26. Mocciaro Li Destri A., Minà A., Picone P.M. Corporate social irresponsibility and stakeholders’ support: evidence from a case study. Journal of Management and Governance. 2024;28(1):37–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-022-09639-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-022-09639-4
  27. Colonnello S., Curatola G., Gioffré A. Pricing sin stocks: Ethical preference vs. risk aversion. Eur Econ Rev. 2019;118:69–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2019.04.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2019.04.006
  28. Nardella G., Brammer S., Surdu I. Shame on Who? The Effects of Corporate Irresponsibility and Social Performance on Organizational Reputation. British Journal of Management. 2020;31(1):5–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12365 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12365
  29. Guenster N., Brodback D., Pouget S., et al. The Valuation of Corporate Social Responsibility: A Willingness to Pay Experiment. Proceedings of the EUROFIDAI-ESSEC Paris December Finance Meeting. 2022. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4260824 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4260824

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2024 Cahyaningdyah D., Abiprayu K.B., Ridloah S., Wicaksari E.A.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.