Interpretation of Communism and Post-Communist Transformations in Russia: Modern Theoretical Discussions
- Authors: Gutorov V.A.1, Shirinyants A.A.2
-
Affiliations:
- Saint Petersburg State University
- Lomonosov Moscow State University
- Issue: Vol 23, No 4 (2021): Identity in the Political Constructions of Modernity
- Pages: 525-544
- Section: THE DIMENSIONS OF IDENTITY IN MODERN RUSSIA
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/2313-1438/article/view/322092
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-1438-2021-23-4-525-544
- ID: 322092
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The analysis of discussions on various aspects of the evolution of the modern state, the specifics of post-communist transformations and the role that Marxism and the tradition of radical socialist thought can play in the near future in their search for a way out of the crisis generated by the agony of the neoliberal global world order. As a starting point for the analysis, theoretical articles published in the second edition of the collection “Communism, Anticommunism, Russophobia in post-Soviet Russia. 2nd ed., Add. / Auth.: P.P. Apryshko et al. - Moscow: World of Philosophy, Algorithm, 2021 (607 p.) were selected. A comparative analysis of the polemical works of domestic scientists, political theorists and philosophers with those discussions that for many decades have been conducted by their colleagues abroad clearly indicates that today none of the existing ideologies, as well as the paradigms of economic and socio-political theory, can pretend to be the only recourse. The experience of recent decades clearly excludes the very possibility of transforming the economy and society on the basis of a certain universal synthetic model. In post-communist Russia, the heat of political passions, which stimulates the extreme polarization of political programs for overcoming the crisis, also hinders the achievement of agreement and the search for a solution acceptable to all.
About the authors
Vladimir A. Gutorov
Saint Petersburg State University
Author for correspondence.
Email: gut-50@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8063-2558
Doctor of Science in Philosophy, Professor, Head of the Department of Theory and Philosophy of Politics, Faculty of Political Science
Saint Petersburg, Russian FederationAlexander A. Shirinyants
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Email: jants@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6949-2256
Doctor of Science in Political Sciences, Professor, Head of the Department of History of Social and Political Doctrines of the Faculty of Political Science
Moscow, Russian FederationReferences
- Berdyaev, N. (1990a). The new Middle Ages. Reflections on the fate of Russia and Europe. Moscow. (In Russian).
- Berdyaev, N. (2008). Russian idea. Saint Petersburg. (In Russian).
- Berdyaev, N.А. (1990b). The fate of Russia. Experiments on the psychology of war and nationality. Moscow. (In Russian).
- Voslenskij, M.S. (1991). Nomenclature. The ruling class of the Soviet Union. Moscow. (In Russian).
- Gaman-Golutvina, O. et al. (2004). Post-Soviet liberalism: Crisis or collapse? Vestnik analitiki, 3, 208-252. (In Russian).
- Apryshko, P.P. et al. (2021). Communism, anti-communism, Russophobia in post-Soviet Russia. Moscow. (In Russian).
- Lavrov, V. (2018). The Orthodox view of Lenin’s experiment on Russia. Moscow. (In Russian).
- Reshetnikov, L.P. (2019). Back to Russia. Moscow. (In Russian).
- Rormozer, G., & Frenkin, А.А. (1996). The new conservatism: A challenge for Russia. Moscow. (In Russian).
- Alford, R.R., & Friedland, R. (1985). Powers of theory. Capitalism, the state, and democracy. Cambridge.
- Althusser, L. (2014). On the reproduction of capitalism. Ideology and ideological state apparatuses. London; New York.
- Aron, R. (1970). Marxismes imaginaires: D’une sainte famille à l’autre. Paris. (In French).
- Balampanidis, Y. (2018). Eurocommunism: From the communist to the radical european left. London; New York.
- Balibar, E. (1977). On the dictatorship of proletariat. London: Atlantic Highlands, New York.
- Boggs, C., & Plotke, D. (Eds.). (1980). The Politics of Eurocommunism: Socialism in Transition. London; Basingstoke.
- Boggs, С. (2011). Phantom democracy: Corporate interests and political power in America. New York.
- Buchwalter, A. (2015). Hegel and Capitalism. Albany.
- Coffey, D., & Thornley, C. (2009). Globalization and varieties of capitalism. New labor, economic policy and the abject state. New York.
- Crouch, C. (2013). From markets versus states to corporations versus civil society? In A. Schäfer & W. Streeck (Eds.), Politics in the age of austerity (pp. 219-238). Cambridge.
- Cunliffe, Ph. (2017). Lenin lives! Reimagining the Russian revolution. 1917-2017. Winchester, UK; Washington, US.
- Ellul, J. (1964). The technological society. New York.
- Fletcher, R. (Ed.). (1987). Bernstein to Brandt: A Short History of German Social Democracy. London; New York.
- Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2000). Empire. Cambridge, Massachusetts; London.
- Haseler, S. (2000). The super-rich: The unjust new world of global capitalism. New York.
- Hedlund, S. (2005). Russian path dependence: A people with a troubled history. London; New York.
- Hedlund, S. (2011). Invisible hands, Russian experience, and social science: Approaches to understanding systemic failure. New York.
- Hellie, R. (1971). Enserfment and military change in Muscovy. Chicago; London.
- Hellie, R. (1982). Slavery in Russia, 1450-1725. Chicago; London.
- Hellie, R. (2005). The Structure of Russian Imperial History. History and Theory, 44, 88-112.
- Hunt, R. (1964). German Social Democracy 1918-1933. New Haven; London.
- Kapustin, B. (2016). A People in the Absence of the People, or a View of Postcommunism from Below. In P. Dutkiewicz, R. Sakwa & V. Kulikov (Eds.), The Social History of Post-Communist Russia (pp. 11-40). London; New York
- Lester, J. (1998). Feudalism’s revenge: The inverse dialectics of time in Russia. Contemporary Politics, 4(2), 193-203.
- Luttwak, E. (1998). Turbo-capitalism: Winners and losers in the global economy. New York.
- Mann, M. (1988). States, war and capitalism. Oxford; Cambridge.
- McDaniel, T. (1991). Autocracy, modernization and revolution in Russia and Iran. Princeton, New Jersey.
- Mills, C.W. (1956). The power elite. New York: Vintage Books.
- Musacchio, A., & Lazzarini, S.G. (2014). Reinventing state capitalism. Leviathan in business, Brazil and beyond. Cambridge, Massachusetts; London.
- Orwell, G. (2017). Capitalism and communism: Two paths to slavery. In Political Writings of George Orwell. Prabhat Prakashan.
- Rodrik, D. (2012). The globalization paradox: Why global markets, states, and democracy can’t coexist. Oxford; New York.
- Rosa, H., Lessenich, S., Kennedy, M., & Waigel, T. (2014). Weil Kapitalismus sich ändern muss. Wiesbaden. (In German).
- Rosefielde, S. & Hedlund, S. (2008). Russia since 1980: Wrestling with westernization. New York, 2008.
- Schorske, C.E. (1983). German social democracy, 1905-1917: The development of the great schism. Cambridge, Massachusetts; London.
- Shlapentokh, V. (1996). Early feudalism - The best parallel for contemporary Russia. Europe-Asia Studies, 48(3), 393-411.
- Therborn, G. (1978). What the ruling class do when it rules? London; New York.
- Therborn, G. (1995). European modernity and beyond. The trajectory of European societies, 1945-2000. London; Thousand Oaks; New Delhi.
- Therborn, G. (2008). From Marxism to Post-Marxism? London; New York.
- Wallerstein, I. (1984). The politics of the world-economy. The states, the movements, and the civilizations. Cambridge.
- Weber, M. (1988). Zur Lage der bürgerlichen Demokratie in Russland. In J. Winckelmann (Ed.), Gesammelte politische Schriften (pp. 33-68). Tübingen. (In German).
- Zimmermann, J., & Werner, J.R. (2013). Regulating capitalism? The evolution of transnational accounting governance. New York.
Supplementary files
