New Challenges and Prospects of the Eurasian Economic Commission as a Negotiating Platform
- Autores: Koktysh K.E.1, Renard-Koktysh A.V.1
-
Afiliações:
- Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University) of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation
- Edição: Volume 26, Nº 1 (2024): Turn to the East
- Páginas: 155-168
- Seção: PROBLEMS OF REGIONAL INTEGRATION AND IMAGE POLICY
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/2313-1438/article/view/322453
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-1438-2024-26-1-155-168
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/MQVTTO
- ID: 322453
Citar
Texto integral
Resumo
The study is devoted to the cognitive analysis of the current state of the Eurasian Economic Commission, which is the main institution of integration of the economies of the Western Eurasia. Deconstruction of the European principle of the “four freedoms” that was laid down in the basis of the EAEU allows authors to conclude that further implementation of the latter will lead to the reproduction of the EU’s weaknesses that have become obvious today. Moreover, it will lead to internal conflicts, primarily between corporations, which will be mainly Russian, and the member states. The predictable result will be a decrease in the functionality of the Eurasian Union, which has already taken noticeable forms. It produces the obvious risks of turning of this important negotiating platform into an artifact that does not meet the challenges that arose with the beginning of Russia’s Special military operation. The authors see a way out in «balancing» the principle of «four freedoms», which de facto leads to redistribution of resources in favor of corporations, with the principle of security. The extrapolation of latter to the economic sphere can allow not only to strengthen the regulatory role of states, but also to move to the creation of a production circuit within the Eurasian Economic Union based on the common system of division of labor. In their theoretical constructions, the authors appeal to the successful experience of China, which managed to introduce a system of moral and ethical restrictions for business, and thereby managed to make profitable a «long» investment focused not on the consumption of an individual, but on the prosperity of society as a whole.
Palavras-chave
Sobre autores
Kirill Koktysh
Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University) of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation
Autor responsável pela correspondência
Email: kirill.koktysh@gmail.com
ORCID ID: 0000-0002-7507-1669
Código SPIN: 7619-0344
Doctor of Political Sciences, Professor of the Department of Political Theory
Moscow, Russian FederationAnna Renard-Koktysh
Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University) of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation
Email: renard.anna@gmail.com
ORCID ID: 0009-0006-8510-7406
Postgraduate Student of the Department of Political Theory
Moscow, Russian FederationBibliografia
- Abelson, R. (1987). Structures of persuasion. In V.M. Sergeev & P.B. Parshin (Eds.), Language and modeling of social interaction (pp. 317–380). Moscow. (In Russian).
- Alekseeva, T.A. (2018). Contemporary political thought (XX–XXI centuries): Political theory and international relations. Moscow: Aspekt Press. (In Russian).
- Biryukov, N., & Sergeyev, V. (1997). Russian politics in transition. London: Routledge. (In Russian).
- Eco, U. (1998). La Struttura Assente. S.-Petersburg, Petropolis. (In Russian). [Eco, U. (1998). La Struttura assente: la ricerca semiotica e il metodo strutturale. Bompiani].
- Gaponenko, V.F. (2016). Development of the Eurasian Economic Union in the context of Russian economic security. In L.N. Krasavina (Ed.), Trends and prospects of development of the Eurasian Economic Union in the context of the experience of European integration and the global challenges. (pp. 221–225). Moscow: Financial University. (In Russian).
- Grigoriev, O.V. (2014). The epoch of growth. Lectures on economics. The rise and decline of the world economic system. Moscow: Career Press. (In Russian.).
- Holsti, O. (1976). Foreign policy formation viewed cognitive. In R. Axelrod (Ed.), Structure of decision: The cognitive maps of political elites. Princeton.
- Jonsson, C. (Ed.). (1982). Cognitive dynamics in international politics. London.
- Kalish, Y.V. (2016). Political aspects of the Eurasian integration in the context of the EU experienc. In L.N. Krasavina (Ed.), Trends and prospects of development of the Eurasian Economic Union in the context of the experience of European integration and the global challenges. (pp. 226–230). Moscow: Financial University. (In Russian).
- Kharichev, A.D., Shutov, A.Yu., Polosin, A.V., & Sokolova, E.N. (2022). Perception of basic values, factors and structures socio-historical development of Russia (based on research and testing materials) Journal of political researches, 6(3), 9–19. http://doi.org/10.12737/2587-6295-2022-6-3-9-19.
- Khrustalev, M.A. (2008). Analysis of international situations and political expertise: Essays on theory and methodology. Moscow: NOFMO. (In Russian).
- Koktysh, K.E. (2021a). Belarus: A new geopolitical reality? Polis. Political studies, 3, 91–110. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2021.03.07
- Koktysh, K.E. (2021b). The discourse of rationalism, liberty, and democracy. Moscow: MGIMOUniversity. (In Russian).
- Koktysh, K.E., & Renard-Koktysh, A.V. (2021). The cognitive dimension of security. International Trends, 19, 4(67), 26–46. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.17994/IT.2021.19.4.67.3
- Kotlyarov, N.N. (2016). Development of cluster systems in the context of industrial cooperation among the EAEU member states. In L.N. Krasavina (Ed.), Trends and prospects of development of the Eurasian Economic Union in the context of the experience of European integration and the global challenges (pp. 55–59). Moscow: Financial University. (In Russian).
- Krasavina, L.N. (2016). Perspectives of development of the Eurasian integration from the Eurasian Economic Union to the Economic and Monetary Union (based on the experience of the euro area. In L.N. Krasavina (Ed.), Trends and prospects of development of the Eurasian Economic Union in the context of the experience of European integration and the global challenges (pp. 170–176). Moscow: Financial University. (In Russian).
- Lakoff, G., & Johnsen, M. (2004). Metaphors we live by. Moscow: Editorial URSS. (In Russian). [Lakoff, G., & Johnsen, M. (2003). Metaphors we live by. London: The university of Chicago press].
- Lindblom, Ch., & Cohen, D. (1979). Usable knowledge: Social science and social problem solving. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
- North, D. (1997). Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. Moscow (In Russian). [North, D. (1990). Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press].
- Perskaya, V.V. (2016). Development of the real sector of the EAEU member states and global value chain. In L.N. Krasavina (Ed.), Trends and prospects of development of the Eurasian Economic Union in the context of the experience of European integration and the global challenges (pp. 35–38). Moscow: Financial University. (In Russian).
- Polyakova, O.V. (2016). Development of the EAEU’s single market: obstacles to the implementation of the “four freedoms” concep. In L.N. Krasavina (Ed.), Trends and prospects of development of the Eurasian Economic Union in the context of the experience of European integration and the global challenges (pp. 66–68). Moscow: Financial University. (In Russian).
- Ponomareva, E.G. (2021). Protest movement in Belarus: Evolution, technologies, symbols. Obozrevatel — Observer, 2(373), 5–28. (In Russ.).
- Sergeev, V.M. (2013). Democracy in the service of the elites. Moscow: MGIMO University. (In Russian).
- Simonov, V.V. (2016). Issues of the development of regional integration and credit support for the real sector of the econom. In L.N. Krasavina (Ed.), Trends and prospects of development of the Eurasian Economic Union in the context of the experience of European integration and the global challenges (pp. 28–34). Moscow: Financial University. (In Russian).
- Tkachenko, A.A. (2016). Cultural aspects of development of the Eurasian Economic Union amid global challenges. In L.N. Krasavina (Ed.), Trends and prospects of development of the Eurasian Economic Union in the context of the experience of European integration and the global challenges (pp. 205–211). Moscow: Financial University. (In Russian).
Arquivos suplementares
