Theoretical and Methodological Bases of a New School Model in Russia: Cultural-Historical Psychology and the Activity Approach as the Foundation of Educational Practice
- Авторлар: Zaretsky V.K.1, Zaretsky Y.V.1, Karyagina T.D.1,2, Ostroverkh O.S.3, Tikhomirova A.V.1, Fedorenko E.Y.4
-
Мекемелер:
- Moscow State University of Psychology and Education
- Psychological Institute of Russian Academy of Education
- Siberian Federal University
- Moscow School of Social and Economic Science
- Шығарылым: Том 18, № 1 (2021)
- Беттер: 122-139
- Бөлім: PERSONALITY IN THE MODERN EDUCATIONAL ENVIRONMENT IN RUSSIA AND IN THE WORLD
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/2313-1683/article/view/326026
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-1683-2021-18-1-122-139
- ID: 326026
Дәйексөз келтіру
Толық мәтін
Аннотация
To overcome the crisis of the modern school institution, it is necessary to qualitatively rethink its foundations and to design fundamentally new approaches to implementing the educational program. The theoretical and methodological bases of the concept of a new type of school as a development practice, based on the provisions of Russian cultural-historical psychology and the activity approach are presented. The purpose of the work is to consider in the modern context the key theoretical provisions of Russian psychology and to formulate the methodological principles arising from them, which set the conditions for organizing the educational process, thus ensuring the transition from theory to practice. The key concepts of the school model are ‘development’, ‘agency’ and ‘collaboration’: ‘infinite development’ is formulated as the supreme goal and value of the school, the development of the position of agency is considered as the main productive process, and collaboration is the main professional principle. Eight basic principles are formulated as follows: intent - implementation - reflection as a methodological scheme for organizing school processes, the principle of multidimensional development, the principle of equal importance of school activities, the principle of congruence, the principle of organizing the educational space as a space for growing up, the principle of fellowship of practices and the development-oriented approach to evaluation. Thus, the article presents the authors’ view of the school as a scientifically grounded anthropological practice. The implementation of the concept, which has already begun in Russia, is an experiment that will make it possible to verify these theoretical and methodological provisions.
Авторлар туралы
Viktor Zaretsky
Moscow State University of Psychology and Education
Хат алмасуға жауапты Автор.
Email: zaretskiyvk@mgppu.ru
PhD in Psychology, is Professor at Individual and Group Psychotherapy Department of the Faculty of Counseling and Clinical Psychology
29 Sretenka St, Moscow, 127051, Russian FederationYury Zaretsky
Moscow State University of Psychology and Education
Email: zaretskiyyuv@mgppu.ru
PhD in Psychology, is Associate Professor at Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy Departmen of the Faculty of Clinical and Counseling Psychology
29 Sretenka St, Moscow, 127051, Russian FederationTatiana Karyagina
Moscow State University of Psychology and Education; Psychological Institute of Russian Academy of Education
Email: kartan18@gmail.com
Psychology, is Senior Researcher at Laboratory of Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy of the Psychological Institute of Russian Academy of Education, and Associate Professor at Individual and Group Psychotherapy Department of the Faculty of Counseling and Clinical Psychology, Head of the Master’s Program on Counseling Psychology of the Moscow State University of Psychology and Education
29 Sretenka St, Moscow, 127051, Russian Federation; 9 Mokhovaya St, bldg 4, Moscow, 125009, Russian FederationOksana Ostroverkh
Siberian Federal University
Email: ostrovoksana@mail.ru
PhD in Psychology, is Associate Professor at Human Resource Psychology and Management Department of the Institute of Economics, Management and Environmental Studies
79 Svobodniy Ave, Krasnoyarsk, 660041, Russian FederationAnna Tikhomirova
Moscow State University of Psychology and Education
Email: tihomirovaav@mgppu.ru
Lecturer of the Department of Individual and Group Psychotherapy Department of the Faculty of Counseling and Clinical Psychology, Leading Analyst of the Center for Evidence-Based Social Design
29 Sretenka St, Moscow, 127051, Russian FederationElena Fedorenko
Moscow School of Social and Economic Science
Email: e.fedorenko@mail.ru
PhD in Psychology, is Dean of the Faculty of Management in Education
82 Vernadskogo Ave, Moscow, 119571, Russian FederationӘдебиет тізімі
- Arievitch, I.M (2017). Beyond the Brain: An Agentive Activity Perspective on Mind, Development, and Learning. Sense Publishers.
- Alekseev, N.G. (2002). Proektirovanie uslovii razvitiya refleksivnogo myshleniya. Ph.D. in Psychology Thesis. Moscow: MPSU. (In Russ.)
- Belopolskaya, N.L. (1997). Otsenka kognitivnykh i emotsionalnykh komponentov zony blizhayshego razvitiya u detey s zaderzhkoy psikhicheskogo razvitiya. Voprosy Psikhologii, (1), 19-25. (In Russ.)
- Blonsky, P.P. (1979). Izbrannye pedagogicheskie i psikhologicheskie sochineniya. Moscow: Pedagogika Publ. (In Russ.)
- Chudinova, E.V., & Sanina, S.P. (2016). Ekspress-diagnostika osnovnykh obrazovatelnykh rezultatov v nachalnoy i osnovnoy shkole. Moscow: Avtorsky klub Publ. (In Russ.)
- Davydov, V.V. (1996). Teoriya razvivayushchego obucheniya. Moscow: INTOR. (In Russ.)
- Davydov, V.V., Slobodchikov, V.I., & Tsukerman, G.A. (1992). Mladshy shkolnik kak subyekt deyatelnosti. Voprosy Psikhologii, (3), 14-19. (In Russ.)
- Elkonin, B.D., & Frumin, I.D. (1993). Obrazovatelnoe prostranstvo kak prostranstvo razvitiya (“shkola vzrosleniya”). Voprosy Psikhologii, (1), 24-33. (In Russ.)
- Elkonin, B.D. (2015). Pedagogicheskaya ideya razvivayushchego obucheniya. In B.D. El-konin, B.A. Arkhipov, O.S. Ostroverkh & O.I. Sviridova (Eds.), Sovremennost i vozrast (pp. 26-28). Moscow: Avtorsky klub Publ. (In Russ.)
- Elkonin, D.B. (1989). Izbrannye psikhologicheskie trudy. Moscow: Pedagogika Publ. (In Russ.)
- Gordon, M.M., & Zaretsky, V.K. (2000). Proekt Obshchestvennogo dogovora “Ob usloviyakh normalnogo razvitiya osobennogo rebenka”. Pervoe Sentyabrya, (40). (In Russ.)
- Gromyko, Yu.V., Margolis, A.A., & Rubtsov, V.V. (2020). The school as ecosystem of developing child-adult communities: activity approach to designing the school of the future. Kulturno-istoricheskaya Psikhologiya [Cultural-Historical Psychology], 16(1), 57-67. https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2020160106 (In Russ.)
- Khasan, B.I. (1990). Soderzhatelnyy konflikt - uslovie uchebnoy deyatelnosti i mekhanizm yeyo razvitiya. Sovremennoe sostoyanie i perspektivy razvivayushchego obucheniya (pp. 22-27). Krasnoyarsk: KSU Publ. (In Russ.)
- Kholmogorova, A.B. (2016). Significance of Cultural-Historical Theory of psychological development of L.S. Vygotsky for the development of modern models of social cognition and psychotherapy. Kulturno-istoricheskaya Psikhologiya [Cultural-Historical Psychology], 12(3), 58-92. https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2016120305 (In Russ.)
- Kravtsova, E.E. (2001). Kulturno-istoricheskie osnovy zony blizhaishego razvitiya. Psikhologichesky Zhurnal, 22(4), 42-50. (In Russ.)
- Leontev, A.N. (1978). Activity, Consciousness, and Personality. Prentice-Hall. Retrieved December 20, 2020, from https://www.marxists.org/archive/leontev/works/1978/index.htm
- Leontiev, D.A. (1997). Samorealizatsiya i sushchnostnye sily cheloveka. In D.A. Leontiev & V.G. Shchur (Eds.), Psikhologiya s chelovecheskim litsom: gumanisticheskaya perspektiva v post-sovetskoy psikhologii (pp. 156-176). Moscow: Smysl Publ. (In Russ.)
- Nikolaevskaya, I.A. (2020). Situational-vectorial analysis of transcripts of sessions, aimed at overcoming of learning difficulties: a case study. Klinicheskaya i Spetsialnaya Psikhologiya [Clinical Psychology and Special Education], 9(1), 186-203. https://doi.org/10.17759/cpse.2020090110 (In Russ.)
- Obukhova, L.F., & Korepanova, I.A. (2005). Prostranstvenno-vremennaya skhema zony blizhayshego razvitiya. Voprosy Psikhologii, (5), 13-26. (In Russ.)
- Ostroverkh, O.S. (2012). Pedagogical Action in Educational Space of the Younger Pupils Schooling Activities. Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences, 11(5), 1628-1638.
- Petrovsky, V. A. (2010). Sushchestvuet li Ya - subyekt poznaniya. Metodologiya i Istoriya Psikhologii, (1), 136-148. (In Russ.)
- Polivanova, K.N. (2012). Praktiki razvitiya: Vzroslenie v sovremennom mire. “Novoe detstvo” Seminar Proceedings. Retrieved December 20, 2020, from https://psyjournals.ru/newchildhood/issue/56292.shtml (In Russ.)
- Rubinshteyn, S.L. (1986). Printsip tvorcheskoy samodeyatelnosti (k filosofskim osnovam sovremennoy pedagogiki). Voprosy Psikhologii, (4), 101-109. (In Russ.)
- Rubtsov, V.V., Margolis, A.A., & Guruzhapov, V.A. (1996). Kulturno-istorichesky tip shkoly (proyekt razrabotki). Psychological Science and Education, 1(4), 79-93. (In Russ.)
- Sanina, S.P. (2016). Development of primary school teacher’s competences in the process of solving professional tasks. Psikhologicheskaya Nauka i Obrazovanie Psyedu.ru [Psychological Science and Education psyedu.ru] 8(4), 41-49. https://doi.org/10.17759/psyedu.2016080405 (In Russ.)
- Slobodchikov, V.I., & Isaev, E.M. (1991). Kategoriya vozrasta v psikhologii i pedagogike razvitiya. Voprosy Psikhologii, (2), 37-50. (In Russ.)
- Stetsenko, A. P. (2020). Critical Challenges in Cultural-Historical Activity Theory: the Urgency of Agency. Kulturno-istoricheskaya Psikhologiya [Cultural-Historical Psychology], 16(2), 5-18. https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2020160202
- Tsukerman, G.A. (1996). Ot umeniya sotrudnichat k umeniyu uchit sebya. Psychological Science and Education, (2), 27-42. (In Russ.)
- Tsukerman, G.A. (2006). Child-adult interaction: the creation of zone of proximal development. Kulturno-istoricheskaya Psikhologiya [Cultural-Historical Psychology], (4), 61-73. (In Russ.)
- Tsukerman, G.A., & Venger, A.L. (2010). Razvitie uchebnoy samostoyatelnosti. Moscow: OIRO Publ. (In Russ.)
- Tsukerman, G.A., & Masterov, B.M. (1995). Psikhologiya samorazvitiya. Moscow: Interpraks Publ. (In Russ.)
- Vasilyuk, F.E. (1996). Metodologichesky smysl psikhologicheskogo skhizisa. Voprosy Psikhologii, (6), 25-40. (In Russ.)
- Vasilyuk, F.E. (2007) Ponimayushchaya psikhoterapiya kak psikhotekhnicheskaya sistema. Doctor of Psychology Thesis. Moscow: Psychological Institute of RAE. (In Russ.)
- Vasilyuk, F.E. (2015). Coexperiencing Psychotherapy as a Psychotechnical System. Journal of Russian & East European Psychology, 52(1), 1-58. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/10610405.2015.1064721
- Vygotsky, L. S. (1999). Dinamika umstvennogo razvitiya shkolnika v svyazi s obucheniem. Pedagogicheskaya psikhologiya. Moscow: Pedagogika Press. (In Russ.)
- Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). The Historical Meaning of the Crisis in Psychology: A Methodological Investigation. The Collected Works of Vygotsky. Plenum Press. Retrieved December 20, 2020, from https://www.marxists.org/archive/vygotsky/works/crisis/index.htm
- Vygotsky, L.S. (1962). Thinking and Speaking. Thought and Language. The M.I.T. Press. Retrieved December 20, 2020, from https://www.marxists.org/archive/vygotsky/works/words/index.htm
- Vygotsky, L.S. (1984). Problemy detskoy (vozrastnoy psikhologii). In L.S. Vygotsky, Collected Works (vol. 4, pp. 243-432). Moscow: Pedagogika Publ. (In Russ.)
- Wertsch, J.V. (2004). From social interaction to higher psychological processes: A clarification and application of Vygotsky’s theory. Human Development, (51), 66-79.
- Zaretsky, V.K. (2009). The zone of proximal development - What Vygotsky did not have time to write. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 47(6), 70-93. https://doi.org/10.2753/RPO1061-0405470604
- Zaretsky, V.K. (2013). Stanovlenie i sushchnost refleksivno-deyatelnostnogo podkhoda v okazanii konsultativnoy psikhologicheskoy pomoshchi. Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy, 21(2), 8-37. (In Russ.)
- Zaretsky, V.K. (2016). Vygotsky’s Principle “One step in learning - one hundred steps in development”: From Idea to Practice. Cultural-Historical Psychology, 12(3), 149-188. https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2016120309
- Zaretsky, V.K., Zaretsky, Yu.V., Ostroverkh, O.S., Tikhomirova, A.V., Fedorenko, E.Yu. (2020). Sravnitelny analiz kontseptualnykh osnovanii sovremennykh obrazovatelnykh sistem i obrazovatelnykh praktik (na primere sravneniya sistemy razvivayushchego obucheniya i refleksivno-deyatelnostnogo podkhoda). Psikhologo-Pedagogicheskie Issledovaniya, 12(4), 3-18. https://doi.org/10.17759/psyedu.2020120401 (In Russ.)
- Zaretsky, Yu.V. (2014). Subyektnaya pozitsiya shkolnikov po otnosheniyu k uchebnoy deyatelnosti v raznykh vozrastnykh periodakh. Ph.D. in Psychology Thesis. Moscow. (In Russ.)
- Zaretsky, Yu.V. (2013). Subject position on learning activity as a resource for the development and the subject of the study. Konsultativnaya Psikhologiya i Psikhoterapiya [Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy], (2), 110-128. (In Russ.)
- Zinchenko, V.P. (2011). Lev Semenovich Vygotsky: Zhizn i deyatelnost. In T.G. Shchedrina (Ed.), Stil myshleniya: Problema istoricheskogo yedinstva nauchnogo znaniya. K 80-letiyu Vladimira Petrovicha Zinchenko (pp. 294-299). Moscow: Rossiiskaya politicheskaya entsiklopediya. (In Russ.)
Қосымша файлдар

