Historical Aspect and Prerequisites for Amending the Constitution of the RF
- Authors: Jilkin VA1
-
Affiliations:
- Law Office Kari Korhonen, Helsinki
- Issue: Vol 4, No 3 (2017)
- Pages: 202-207
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/2410-7522/article/view/18317
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/RJLS18317
- ID: 18317
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##References
- Жилкин В.А. Комментарий к решению ЕСПЧ по делу ОАО Нефтяная компания «Юкос» против России // Российский судья. 2017. № 3. С. 59.
- Зорькин В.Д. Доклад на международной конференции, посвященной 65-летию Нюрнбергского процесса. Санкт-Петербург. 16.05.2011.
- Послание Президента В.В. Путина Федеральному Собранию 25 апреля 2005 г.
- Решение Конституционного Суда РФ от 13.05.2005 по делу № 2004-18-0106.
- Case of Hirst v. the United Kingdom (no. 2). 6 October 2005, Case of Anchugov and Gladkov v. Russia. 4 July 2013.
- Clinton H. Hard Choices. Simon & Schuster Inc. 2014.
- Giancarlo Parretti v. United States. 112 F.3d 1363. U.S. Court of Appeals, May 6, 1997.
- Morningstar R. U.S. Government Assistance to and Cooperative Activities with the NIS of the Former Soviet Union: Quarterly Report, July-September 1995, U.S. Department of State, September 1995.
- Peter C. Ordeshook and Tomas Scwartz. A Constitution for the Russian Federation. Working paper No. 51. Centre for Institutional Reform and the Informal Sector. May, 1993. P. 2.
- United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. Argued Nov. 13, 1987.
- U.S. Supreme Court. Murray v. The Charming Betsey, 6 U.S. 2 Cranch 64 64 (1804).
- USAID from American people. Russia Rule of Law Assessment. This report was produced for the United States Agency for International Development by DPK Consulting. April, 2008.
Supplementary files
