Representation of Expert Knowledge in the Legal Field and the Problem of Legitimacy of Legal Decisions
- Authors: Maslovskaya EV1
-
Affiliations:
- The Sociological Institute of FCTAS RAS
- Issue: Vol 5, No 2 (2018)
- Pages: 58-66
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/2410-7522/article/view/18401
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/RJLS18401
- ID: 18401
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
E V Maslovskaya
The Sociological Institute of FCTAS RAS
Email: ev_maslovskaya@mail.ru
References
- Бек У. Общество риска. На пути к другому модерну. М.: Прогресс-Традиция, 2000.
- Бурдье П. Социальное пространство: поля и практики. СПб.: Алетейя, 2005.
- Масловская Е. В. Особенности взаимодействия экспертов со следственными и судебными органами (на примере судебно-медицинских экспертов и экспертов в области оценочной деятельности) // РЖПИ. 2016. № 4. С. 148-153.
- Caudill D., La Rue L. No Magic Wand: The Idealization of Science in Law. New York: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, 2006.
- Derksen L. Towards a Sociology of Measurement: The Meaning of Measurement Error in the case of DNA Profiling // Social Studies of Science. 2000. Vol. 30. № 6. P. 803-845.
- Edmond H. Judicial Representations of Scientific Evidence // Modern Law Review. 2000. Vol. 63. № 2. P. 216-251.
- Eisenstein J., Jacob H. Felony Justice: An Organizational Analysis of Criminal Court. Boston: Little, Brown and Co., 1977.
- Krieken R. Law’s Autonomy in Action: Anthropology and History in Court // Social and Legal Studies. 2006. Vol. 15. № 4. P. 574-590.
- Liberatore A., Funtowicz S. ‘Democratizing’ Expertise, ‘Expertizing’ Democracy: What Does This Mean and Why Bother // Science and Public Policy. 2003. Vol. 30. № 3. P. 146-150.
- Lynch M., Cole S., McNally R., Jordan K. Truth Machine: The Contentious Histor y of DNA Fingerprinting. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2008.
- Nance D. Reliability and the Admissibility of Experts // Seton Hall Law Review. 2003. Vol. 34. P. 191-254.
- Saks M., Faigman D. Expert Evidence after Daubert // Annual Review of Law and Social Science. 2005. Vol.1. P. 105-130.
Supplementary files
