Citations and References: Guidelines on Literature Practices

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Introduction. Citations of scholarly publications are considered an efficient measure of productivity of research and researchers. They are part of scholarly communication, driving the evolving knowledge in all disciplines. Citations form an integral part of literature practices of researchers. The latter are prone to deliberate or unconscious biases. One of the challenges all researchers face is to overcome or at least mitigate identified biases in citation. It may lead to distorting knowledge development in the least possible way.

Purpose. As the research of citations is on the rise, more theoretical background is being developed. The editors call the JLE readers attention to the Triangular Citations, with various relationships among publications formed by citations.

Results. Empirical studies are not unanimous in defining the features that affect citations most. Most researchers highlight a publication source as the most influential feature, with multi feature approach favoured by the academic community at large. Other features entail features relating to authors, journal, and publication itself. Moreover, there are varieties across the disciplines. The field of research of citation behaviour is only beginning to widen. The focus of such research is made on citation behaviour patterns, individual incentives behind the references and citations aligned with financial or reputation stimuli, and citations patterns linked to citation behaviour. Bias in citation threatens to distort knowledge and may evolve it subtly or obviously in a specific direction. Biases are not easy to deal with. In addition, values and mindsets vary across the countries and academic and scholarly communities that hinders efforts to overcome biases.

Сonclusion. The JLE editors sum up the best guidelines on improvements in publications that add to greater citations, with the high quality of articles as the key.

About the authors

E. Tikhonova

HSE University; Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)

Email: jle.hse.journal@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8252-6150

L. Raitskaya

Moscow State Institute of International Relations (MGIMO University)

Author for correspondence.
Email: l.raitskaya@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2086-6090

References

  1. Bai, X., Zhang, F., & Lee, I. (2019). Predicting the citations of scholarly paper. Journal of Informetrics, 13(1), 407-418. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2019.01.010
  2. Bookstein, A., & Yitzhaki, M. (1999). Own-language preference: A new measure of relative language self-citation. Scientometrics, 46(2), 337-348. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02464782
  3. Bu, Y., Waltman, L., & Huang, Y. (2021). A multidimensional framework for characterizing the citation impact of scientific publications. Quantitative Science Studies, 2(1), 155-183. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00109
  4. Dworkin, J. D., Linn, K. A., Teich, E. G., Zurn, P., Shinohara, R. T., & Bassett, D. S. (2020). The extent and drivers of gender imbalance in neuroscience reference lists. Nature Neuroscience, 23(8), 918-926. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-020-0658-y
  5. Ha, T. (2022). An explainable artificial-intelligence-based approach to investigating factors that influence the citation of papers. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121974
  6. Klitzing, N., Hoekstra, R., & Strijbos, J. (2019). Literature practices: Processes leading up to a citation. Journal of Documentation, 75(1), 62-77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-03-2018-0047
  7. Liu, Y., Yang, L., & Chen, M. (2021). A new citation concept: Triangular citation in the literature. Journal of Informetrics, 15(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2021.101141
  8. de Lusignan, S., & Moen, A. (2016). Extracting oneself from the citation-stacking bear trap. Methods of Information in Medicine, 55(4), 301-302. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3414/ME16-03-0001
  9. Meho, L. I. (2007). The rise and rise of citation analysis. Physics World, 20(1), 32-36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/2058-7058/20/1/33
  10. Min, C., Chen, Q., Yan, E., Bu, Y., & Sun, J. (2020). Citation cascade and the evolution of topic relevance. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24370
  11. Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2(2), 175-220. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175
  12. Olszewski, W. (2020). A theory of citations. Research in Economics, 74(3), 193-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rie.2020.06.001
  13. Tahamtan, I., & Bornmann, L. (2018). Core elements in the process of citing publications: Conceptual overview of the literature. Journal of Informetrics, 12(1), 203-216. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.01.002
  14. Vanclay, J. K. (2009). Bias in the journal impact factor. Scientometrics, 78(1), 3-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-008-1778-4
  15. De Vries, Y. A., Roest, A. M., De Jonge, P., Cuijpers, P., Munafò, M. R., & Bastiaansen, J. A. (2018). The cumulative effect of reporting and citation biases on the apparent efficacy of treatments: The case of depression. Psychological Medicine, 48(15), 2453-2455. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291718001873
  16. Waltman, L., Calero-Medina, C., Kosten, J., Noyons, E. C. M., Tijssen, R. J. W., Van Eck, N. J., Van Leeuwen, T.N., Van Raan, A.E., & Wouters, P. (2012). The Leiden ranking 2011/2012: Data collection, indicators, and interpretation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(12), 2419-2432. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22708
  17. Yang, J., & Liu, Z. (2022). The effect of citation behaviour on knowledge diffusion and intellectual structure. Journal of Informetrics, 16(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2021.101225
  18. Zhang, G. (2022). The citational practice of social science research articles: An analysis by part-genres. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2021.101076
  19. Zhang, G., Ding, Y., & Milojevic, S. (2013). Citation content analysis (CCA): A framework for syntactic and semantic analysis of citation content. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(7), 1490-1503. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22850
  20. Zhang, C., Liu, L., & Wang, Y. (2021). Characterizing references from different disciplines: A perspective of citation content analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 15(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2021.101134
  21. Zurn, P., Bassett, D. S., & Rust, N. C. (2020). The citation diversity statement: A practice of transparency, A way of life. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(9), 669-672. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.06.009

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.