Stand-Alone Conclusion Section in Open-Access Research Articles: Organizational Structure

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Background: Research articles (RAs) have been highlighted as one of the most essential channels for academicians to disseminate knowledge. Typically, RAs consist of a nomenclature of the four sections of introduction, methods, results, and discussion, commonly known as IMRD, with each section governed by an organizational structure determined by genre analysis. However, due to the increasing prevalence of the stand-alone conclusion section in recent years and the expansion of open-access journals, understanding how this conclusion section is constructed can benefit scholars in an academic endeavor.

Methods: This study aims to identify the organizational structure of the stand-alone conclusion section in open-access journals. An original dataset of 55 open-access journal RAs from four major academic disciplines honored as “Articles of the Year 2021” was analyzed. Only the RAs with stand-alone conclusions within a calculated word range were selected, yielding a final dataset of 25 comparable conclusion sections. Then, anchored on genre analysis, the compiled dataset was analyzed quantitively and qualitatively.

Results: Based on the genre analysis conducted, a set of three moves and their pertaining steps were identified, forming various organizational patterns but one compelling one. Furthermore, the full-fledged two-layer rhetorical structure of the section depicting the frequencies of occurrence of individual moves and steps is quite revealing, highlighting the crucial significance of restating the findings generated from the study being reported. The results demonstrate not only how established this section is but also how it is currently structured, performing its critical function of concluding RAs.

Conclusion: This study has provided insights into integrating analytical elements to successfully stage persuasive arguments in the conclusion section, a skill that needs to be inculcated in novice or early-career researchers and seasoned researchers alike.

About the authors

B. Kanoksilapatham

Silpakorn University, Phetchaburi, Thailand; Academy of Arts, Royal Society of Thailand

Author for correspondence.
Email: kanoksib@gmail.com

References

  1. Adel, S. M. R., & Ghorbani Moghadam, R. (2015). A comparison of moves in conclusion sections of research articles in psychology, Persian literature and applied linguistics. Teaching English Language, 9(2), 167-191. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22132/TEL.2015.53729
  2. Affandi, A. M., Ali, S., Yazid, B., & Nunuk, W. A. (2021). Previous studies have several limitations ….: Indonesian doctoral students', Indonesian academics', and international authors' research gap strategies in ELT research article abstracts and introductions. Journal of Language and Education, 7(2), 25-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2021.11735
  3. Ahmadi, L. (2022). Rhetorical structure of applied linguistics research article discussions: A comparative cross-cultural analysis. Journal of Language and Education, 8(3), 11-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2022.17520
  4. Amirian, Z., Kassaian, Z., & Tavakoli, M. (2008). Genre analysis: An investigation of the discussion sections of applied linguistics research articles. The Asian ESP Journal, 4(1), 39-63.
  5. Basturkmen, H. (2012). A genre-based investigation of discussion sections of research articles in dentistry and disciplinary variation. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11(2), 134-144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2011.10.004
  6. Bruce, I. (2009). Results sections in sociology and organic chemistry articles: A genre analysis. English for Specific Purposes, 28(2), 105-124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2008.12.005
  7. Chen, T. Y. & Kuo, C. H. (2012). A genre-based analysis of the information structure of master's these in applied linguistics. The Asian ESP Journal, 8(1), 24-52.
  8. Compagnone, A. (2015). The reconceptualization of academic discourse as a professional practice in the digital age: A critical genre analysis of TED Talks. HERMES-Journal of Language and Communication in Business, (54), 49-69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7146/hjlcb.v27i54.22947
  9. Cotos, E., Huffman, S., & Link, S. (2017). A move/step model for methods sections: Demonstrating rigour and credibility. English for Specific Purposes, 46, 90-106. dx. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2017.01.001
  10. Cross, C., & Oppenheim, C. (2006). A genre analysis of scientific abstracts. Journal of Documentation, 62(4), 428-446. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/00220410610700953
  11. Danquah, M. B., Francis, T., Slippe, D. P., & Adentwi-Hayford, D. (2020). A genre analysis of electronic manuals. AU eJournal of Interdisciplinary Research, 5(1), 33-43.
  12. Elena, Z. (2017). Move structure of research article abstracts on management: Contrastive study (the case of English and Russian). Journal of Language and Education, 3(2), 63-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/2411-7390-2017-3-2-63-72
  13. Hu, G., & Liu, Y. (2018). Three-minute thesis presentations as an academic genre: A cross-disciplinary study of genre moves. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 35, 16-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2018.06.004
  14. Juan, Z. H. A. O., & Tao, W. U. (2013). A genre analysis of medical abstracts by Chinese and English native speakers. Journal of Medical Colleges of PLA, 28(1), 60-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1000-1948(13)60018-0
  15. Kanoksilapatham, B. (2005). Rhetorical structure of biochemistry research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 24(3), 269-292. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2004.08.003
  16. Kanoksilapatham, B. (2007). Writing scientific research articles in Thai and English: Similarities and differences. Silpakorn University International Journal, 7, 172-203.
  17. Kanoksilapatham, B. (2012). Research article structure of research article introductions in three engineering subdisciplines. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 55(4), 294-309. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2012.2223252
  18. Kanoksilapatham, B. (2013). Generic characterisation of civil engineering research article abstracts. 3L: Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 19(3), 1-10.
  19. Kanoksilapatham, B. (2015). Distinguishing textual features characterizing structural variation in research articles across three engineering sub-discipline corpora. English for Specific Purposes, 37, 74-86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2014.06.008
  20. Loi, C. K., Evans, M. S., Lim, J. M. H., & Akkakoson, S. (2016). A comparison between Malay and English research article discussions: A move analysis. Sage Open, 6(2), 1-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016652925
  21. Martı́n, P. M. (2003). A genre analysis of English and Spanish research paper abstracts in experimental social sciences. English for Specific Purposes, 22(1), 25-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(01)00033-3
  22. Mering, M., & Hoeve, C. D. (2020). A brief history to the future of open-access. Serials Review, 46(4), 300-304. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00987913.2020.1850041
  23. Morales, R. C. (2012). Conclusions in research articles: A Filipino-Japanese contrastive rhetoric study. Philippines ESL Journal, 8, 83-95.
  24. Moreno, A. I. (2021). Selling research in RA discussion sections through English and Spanish: An intercultural rhetoric approach. English for Specific Purposes, 63, 1-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2021.02.002
  25. Musselin, C. (2018). New forms of competition in higher education. Socio-Economic Review, 16(3), 657-683. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwy033
  26. Pratiwi, S. N., & Kurniawan, E. (2021). Rhetorical move and genre knowledge development of English and Indonesian abstracts: A comparative analysis. Studies in English Language and Education, 8(3), 885-900.
  27. Qian, Y. (2020). A critical genre analysis of MD&A discourse in corporate annual reports. Discourse & Communication, 14(4), 424-437. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481320910525
  28. Ruiying, Y., & Allison, D. (2003). Research articles in applied linguistics: Moving from results to conclusions. English for Specific Purposes, 22(4), 365-385. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S08894906(02)00026-1
  29. Salmaso, G. (2017). Story genres in SFL: A more flexible taxonomy. Extrapolating a taxonomy of story genres in Spanish to story genres in English. Journal of Language and Education, 3(1), 6-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/2411-7390-2017-3-1-6-22
  30. Stoller, F. L., & Robinson, M. S. (2013). Chemistry journal articles: An interdisciplinary approach to move analysis with pedagogical aims. English for Specific Purposes, 32(1), 45-57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2012.09.001
  31. Suherdi, D., Kurniawan, E., & Lubis, A. H. (2020). A genre analysis of research article ‘findings and discussion' sections written by Indonesian undergraduate EFL students. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 10(1), 59-72.
  32. Swales, J. M., & Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge University Press.
  33. Swales, J. M. (2004). Research genres: Explorations and applications. Cambridge University Press.
  34. Viera, C., & Williams, S. A. (2020). Corpus analysis of engagement discourse strategies in academic presentations. Research in Corpus Linguistics. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32714/ricl.08.01.07
  35. Yang, W. (2012). A genre analysis of PhD dissertation acknowledgements. LSP Journal-Language for Special Purposes, Professional Communication, Knowledge Management and Cognition, 3(2).
  36. Zamani, G., & Ebadi, S. (2016). Move analysis of the conclusion sections of research papers in Persian and English. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 11(1), 9-20.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.