电邮这篇文章 
Mythologemes of Myth and Typologemes of History
- 作者: Bondarev А.P.1
-
隶属关系:
- Moscow State Linguistic University
- 期: 编号 13(881) (2023)
- 页面: 114-122
- 栏目: Literary criticism
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/2542-2197/article/view/322563
- ID: 322563
如何引用文章
全文:
详细
The purpose of the proposed article is to substantiate the hypothesis that both mythologeme and typologeme are equally historical categories forming a correlative pair - the unity of analogy and opposition. They are brought together by the archiseme common to the timeless mythologeme and the situational typologeme; they are opposed by the great historical time, localizing the mythologeme in the absolute past, and the typologeme in the relative present, the typified characters and circumstances of which grow to archetypal over time.
作者简介
Аlexandre Bondarev
Moscow State Linguistic University
编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: literatura_mglu@mail.ru
Doctor of Philology (Dr. habil.), Professor, Professor at the Department of Russian and Foreign Literature Faculty of Translation and Interpreting Moscow State Linguistic University
俄罗斯联邦参考
- Eliade, M. (1987). Kosmos i istoriya. Izbrannye raboty = Cosmos and history. Selected works. Moscow: Progress. (In Russ.)
- Jung, K. G. (1996). Dusha i mif: shest’ arhetipov = Soul and myth: six archetypes. Kiev. (In Russ.)
- Schelling, F. V. (1966). Filosofiya iskusstva = Philosophy of Art. Moscow: Mysl. (In Russ.)
- Bondarev, A. P. (2018). Orest i Edip – dva polyusa evropejskoj kul’tury = Orestes and Oedipus – two poles of European culture. In Epistemologiya literaturovedeniya = Epistemology of Literary studies (pр. 129–140). Moscow: Moscow State Linguistic University. (In Russ.)
- Benichou, P. (1967). Morales du grand siècle. Paris: Gallimard.
补充文件
