Problems in determining substantive law norms to protect museum objects and collections as intellectual property
- Authors: ZOLOTOV G.B.1
-
Affiliations:
- Russian State Academy of Intellectual Property
- Issue: Vol 7, No 3 (2023)
- Pages: 386-394
- Section: Материальное право
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/2587-9340/article/view/303507
- ID: 303507
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The importance of the research is conditioned by the ongoing commercialization and expansion of masterpiece and museum objects use limits, as well as museum collections in the context of ensuring the rights and legitimate interests of museums as corresponding intellectual property objects’ right holders. This predetermined the study of museums’ participation peculiarities in civil legal relations taking into account the legal regime of museum objects and museum collections as the purpose of this research. The tasks include the establishment of the museum’s civil legal status as a relevant legal relations subject, civil turnover characterization of museum objects and museum collections and their legal regulation sources, current legislation norms’ application practice analysis on the use of museum objects. The theoretical basis of the research is provided by civilization science representatives’ works of recent years, the subject of which affects public relations connected with the museum objects and museum collections protection as intellectual property objects. The normative basis is formed by the legislation provisions on culture, museum legislation, legislation on intellectual property. The empirical basis is the materials of court cases on disputes on the museum objects use and collections for commercial purposes.
About the authors
Gennady B. ZOLOTOV
Russian State Academy of Intellectual Property
Author for correspondence.
Email: zolotov1753@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3560-5467
Post-Graduate Student, Lecturer of Innovation Management and Intellectual Property Commercialization Department
Russian Federation, 55a Miklukho Maklaya St., Moscow, 117279, Russian FederationReferences
- Shamugiya N.M. (2009). Civil capacity of museums as organizations of culture. Vestnik RUDN. Seriya: Yuridicheskie nauki = RUDN Journal of Law, no. 2, pp. 54-63. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/kvhvaz
- Mukhametzyanova-Duggal R.M. (2021). Issues of protection, protection and commercialization of intellectual property in the museum sphere (on the example of the museum of archeology and ethnography of the Institute of Ethnological Research of the Ufa Federal Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences). Mezhdunarodnyi zhurnal gumanitarnykh i estestvennykh nauk = International Journal of Humanities and Natural Sciences, no. 11-3 (62), pp. 207-210. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24412/2500-1000-2021-11-3-207-210, https://elibrary.ru/orqmni
- Bakaeva A.G. (2016). Spornye voprosy oborota kul’turnykh tsennostei kak ob”ekta intellektual’noi sobstvennosti [Disputable issues of turnover of cultural property as an object of intellectual property]. Izvestiya Saratovskogo universiteta. Novaya seriya. Seriya Ekonomika. Upravlenie. Pravo = Izvestiya of Saratov University. Economics. Management. Law, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 454-458. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18500/1994-2540-2016-16-4-454-458, https://elibrary.ru/yfnjkx
- Kozlova M.Yu., Kozhemyakin D.V., Sergacheva O.A. (2022). Kvaziisklyuchitel’nye prava na muzeinye ob”ekty v tsifrovuyu epokhu [Quasi-exclusive rights to museum objects in the digital age]. Pravo tsifrovoĭ ekonomiki – 2022 (18) [The Law of the Digital Economy – 2022 (18)]. Moscow, Statut Publ., pp. 129-153. (In Russ.)
- Burdova V.D. (2023). Muzei kak sub"ekty isklyuchitel’nykh prav [Museums as subjects of exclusive rights]. Zhurnal Suda po intellektual’nym pravam [Journal of the Intellectual Property Rights Court]. July 21. (In Russ.) Available at: http://ipcmagazine.ru/asp/museums-as-subjects-of-exclusive-rights?ysclid=lmgxrcme7f624234666 (accessed: 23.07.2023)
- Burdova V.D. (2022). Dualism of the legal nature of museum rights. Trudy po intellektual’noi sobstvennosti = Works on Intellectual Property, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 54-59. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17323/tis.2022.14447, https://elibrary.ru/nvwnrp
- Burdova V.D. (2022). Vosproizvedenie muzeinykh predmetov v tsifrovoi srede: NFT i voprosy prava [Reproduction of museum objects in the digital environment: NFT and legal issues]. Sbornik nauchnykh trudov 1 Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii «Tsifrovye tekhnologii i pravo»: v 6 t. [Proceedings of the 1st International Scientific and Practical Conference “Digital Technologies and Law”: in 6 vols.]. Kazan, Publishing house “Poznanie” of Kazan Innovative University, vol. 3, pp. 6-12. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/uhztpu
- Borzilo O.S. (2017). Playing with the classics in postmodern culture. Vestnik Omskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. Gumanitarnye issledovaniya = Review of Omsk State Pedagogical University. Humanitarian Research, no. 3 (16), pp. 10-12. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/zxnvhp
- Sinel’nikova O.V., Glushkova A.I. (2019). Intertextuality as the stream of the past in the artistic culture of the postmodern. Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta kul’tury i iskusstv = Bulletin of Kemerovo State University of Culture and Art, no. 46, pp. 139-146. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/bfdfuv
- Kirillova N.B. (2013). The concept of postmodern as a phenomenon of cultural polyphony. Privolzhskii nauchnyi vestnik = Volga Region Scientific Bulletin, no. 11 (27), pp. 155-162. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/rngtbn
Supplementary files
