Peer Teaching to Assist Tertiary EFL Grammar Learning: Indonesian Tutors’ Perceptions of Challenges and Strategies

Capa

Citar

Texto integral

Resumo

As an essential language component, grammar plays a crucial role in communication. However, with the need to master various L2 forms within several years and an L1 that has a very different grammatical system from English, many tertiary EFL students find grammar learning challenging. To solve this issue, peer teaching/tutoring can be a very effective way to assist students in improving their grammar. While isolated grammar teaching has its downsides, it is superior in clarifying complex concepts and promoting accuracy. It may help increase students’ grammar competence when combined with other methods as an eclectic approach used in a communicative language program. As grammar tutors play a crucial role in helping their peers, this study examines the challenges they perceive in peer tutoring at the tertiary EFL education level and their strategies for overcoming difficulties. Using interviews to collect data from ten EFL grammar tutors, this qualitative study revealed some issues the tutors faced. Besides identifying problems such as motivating students, preparing the materials, and dealing with less/more proficient students, this research demonstrated that peer teaching might lead to ‘cognitive dependence’ among the lower-level learners. To deal with the various issues, the peer tutors applied practical strategies they had developed mainly from intuition and experience.

Sobre autores

Elisabet Murtisari

Universitas Kristen

Email: etmurtisari@gmail.com
ORCID ID: 0000-0001-9337-9483
English Language Education Program, Faculty of Language and Arts

Dewi Puspitasari

Universitas Kristen

Email: dewipuspita4mei@gmail.com
English Language Education Program, Faculty of Language and Arts

Antonina Setiamunadi

Universitas Kristen

Email: antonina.setiamunadi@staff.uksw.edu
ORCID ID: 0000-0001-9705-3368
English Language Education Program, Faculty of Language and Arts

Bibliografia

  1. Adams, J. (2011). Investigating peer tutoring for academic writing support in a UK university. Journal of Academic Writing, 1(1), 110-119. DOI:https://doi.org/10.18552/joaw.v1i1.1
  2. Asghar, A. (2010). Reciprocal peer coaching and its use as a formative assessment strategy for first-year students. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35, 403-417. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930902862834
  3. Bell, D. C., & Elledge, S. R. (2008). Dominance and peer tutoring sessions with English language learners. Learning Assistance Review, 13(1), 17-30.
  4. Berghmans, I., Michiels, L., Salmon, S., Dochy, F., & Struyven, K. (2014). Directive versus facilitative peer tutoring? A view on students' appraisal, reported learning gains and experiences within two differently-tutored learning environments. Learning Environ Res, 17, 437-45. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-014-9168-8
  5. Bohórquez, L. I., Rodríguez, J. D., & González, J. J. (2019). Online peer-tutoring: A renewed impetus for autonomous English learning. HOW Journal, 26(2), 12-31. DOI:https://doi.org/10.19183/how.26.2.503
  6. Bowman-Perrott, L., deMarín, S., Mahadevan, L., & Etchells, M. (2016). Assessing the academic, social, and language production outcomes of English language learners engaged in peer tutoring: A systematic review. Education and Treatment of Children, 39(3), 359-388. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1353/etc.2016.0016
  7. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using a thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  8. Christiansen, B., Bjørk, I.T., Havnes, A., & Hessevaagbakke, E. (2011). Developing supervision skills through peer learning partnership. Nurse Education in Practice, 11(2), 104-108. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2010.11.007
  9. DeKeyser, R. (1998). Beyond focus on form: Cognitive perspectives on learning and practicing second language grammar. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom language acquisition (pp. 42-63). Cambridge University Press.
  10. DeKeyser, R.M. (2008). Introduction: Situating the concept of practice. In R.M. DeKeyser (Ed.), Practice in second language: Perspectives from Applied Linguistics and Cognitive Psychology (2nd ed., pp. 1-18). CUP.
  11. DeKeyser, R.M. (2015). Skill Acquisition theory. In B. Van Patten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (2nd ed., pp. 94-112). Routledge.
  12. Ellis, R. (2015). The importance of focus on form in communicative language teaching. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(2), 1-12. https:/. DOI:https://doi.org/10.32601/ejal.460611
  13. Everaert, P., Opdecam, E., & Maussen, S. (2017). The relationship between motivation, learning approaches, academic performance and time spent. Accounting Education, 26(1), 78-107. https:/. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3200/PSFL.49.1.11-18
  14. Gaies, J. S. (1985). Peer involvement in language learning. Prentice Hall, Inc.
  15. Geertz, C. (1960). The religion of Java. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  16. Green, S. K., Alderman, G., & Liechty, A. (2004). Peer tutoring, individualized intervention, and progress monitoring with at-risk second-grade readers. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 49(1), 11-17,. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3200/PSFL.49.1.11-18
  17. Hidayah, N. (2014). The effectiveness of peer tutoring to students' understanding in using Simple Past Tense [Unpublished thesis]. Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah.http://repository.uinjkt.ac.id/dspace/handle/123456789/1897.
  18. Irawanto, D. W., Ramsey, P.L., & Ryan, J.C. (2011). Challenge of leading in Javanese culture. Asian Ethnicity, 12(2), 125-139. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/14631369.2011.571829
  19. Irvine, S., Williams, B., & McKenna, L. (2018). Near-peer teaching in undergraduate nurse education: An integrative review. Nurse Education Today, 70, 60-68. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2018.08.009
  20. Karpicke, J. D., & Blunt, J. R. (2011). Retrieval practice produces more learning than elaborative studying with concept mapping. Science, 331(6018), 772-775. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1199327
  21. Kim, J. (2018). Could you check my grammar? The forbidden request in the university writing center. International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning, 7(4), 21-37. DOI:https://doi.org/10.5861/ijrsll.2017.2000
  22. LaClare, E., & Franz, T. (2013). Writing centers: Who are they for? What are they for? Studies in Self-Access Learning Journal, 4(1), 5-16.
  23. Larsen-Freeman, D. (2015). Research into practice: Grammar learning and teaching. Language Teaching, 48(2), 263-280. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444814000408
  24. Linnenbrink, E. A., & Pintrich, P. R. (2002). Motivation as an enabler for academic success. School Psychology Review, 31(3), 313-327. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2002.12086158
  25. Long, M. (2016). In defense of tasks and TBLT: Non-issues and real issues. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 36, 5-33. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190515000057
  26. Madaio, M. A., Ogan, A, & Cassell, J. (2016). The effect of friendship and tutoring roles on reciprocal peer tutoring strategies. In A. Micarelli, J. Stamper & K. Panourgia (Eds.), International conference on intelligent tutoring systems (pp.423-429). Springer International Publishing.
  27. McKenna, L., & French, J. (2011). A step ahead: Teaching undergraduate students to be peer teachers. Nurse Education in Practice, 11(2), 141-145. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2010.10.003
  28. Menezes, S.D., & Premnath, D. (2016). Near-peer education: A novel teaching program. International Journal of Medical Education, 7, 160-167.https://doi.og/. DOI:https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.5738.3c28
  29. Mulatsih, M.V.E. (2018). The effectiveness of the grammar tutoring program based on students' feedback in batch 2016 ELESP. LLT Journal, 21(2), 175-182. DOI:https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.2018.2102016
  30. Murtisari, E. T., Hastuti, G., & Arsari, R. W. (2019). EFL students' perception of grammar teaching: Isolated or integrated in skill courses? Asian EFL Journal, 26(6), 207-226.
  31. Murtisari, E. T., Salvadora, L., & Hastuti, G. (2020). Isolated and integrated grammar teaching in a tertiary EFL context: Indonesian teachers' beliefs. SAGA: Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 17-30. DOI:https://doi.org/10.21460/saga.2020.11.9
  32. Mynard, J., & Almarzouqi, I. (2006). Investigating peer tutoring. ELT Journal, 60(1), 13-22. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccio77
  33. Naeger, D. M., Conrad, M., Nguyen, J., Kohi, M., & Webb, E. (2013). Students teaching students: Evaluation of near peer teaching experience. Acad Radiol, 20(9), 1177-82. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2013.04.004
  34. O'Sullivan, I., & Cleary, L. (2014). Peer-tutoring in academic writing: The infectious nature of engagement. Journal of Academic Writing, 4(1), 52-65. DOI:https://doi.org/10.18552/joaw.v4i1.72
  35. Saeed, S., & Zyngier, D. (2012). How motivation influences student engagement: A qualitative case study. Journal of Education and Learning, 1(2), 252-267. DOI:https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v1n2p252
  36. Sheen, R. (2005). Focus on forms as a means of improving accurate oral production. In A. Housen & M. Pierrard (Eds.), Investigations in instructed second language acquisition (pp. 271-310). Mouton de Gruyter.
  37. Snyder, D. W., Nielson, R. P., & Kurzer, K. (2016). Foreign language writing fellows programs: A model for improving advanced writing skills. Foreign Language Annals, 49(4), 750-771. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12231
  38. Spada, N., & Lightbown, P. M. (2008). Form-focused instruction: Isolated or integrated? TESOL Quarterly, 42(2), 181-207. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2008.tb00115.x
  39. Stanley, C. (1998). A framework for teacher reflectivity. TESOL Quarterly, 32(3), 584-591. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/3588129
  40. Steinmayr, R., Weidinger, A. F., Schwinger, M., & Spinath, B. (2019). The importance of students' motivation for their academic achievement: Replicating and extending previous findings. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(1730), 1-11. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01730
  41. Stigmar, M. (2016). Peer-to-peer teaching in higher education: A critical literature review. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 24(20), 124-136. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2016.1178963
  42. Struyven, K., Dochy, F., Janssens, S., & Gielen, S. (2008). Students' experiences with contrasting learning environments: The added value of students' perceptions. Learning Environments Research, 11, 83-109. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-008-9041-8
  43. Takeuchi, H. (2015). Peer tutoring in Japan: A new approach for a unique educational system. Studies in Self-Access Learning Journal, 6(1), 112-119. DOI:https://doi.org/10.37237/060108
  44. Tsang, E.W.K. (1998). Inside story: Mind your identity when conducting cross-national research. Organization Studies, 19(3), 511-515. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/017084069801900307
  45. Umeda, M., Snape, N., Yusa, N., & Wiltshier, J. (2017). The long-term effect of instruction on learners' knowledge of English articles. Language Teaching Research, 23(2), 1-21. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168817739648
  46. Watcharapunyawong, S. (2018). The effects of online peer tutoring on first year undergraduate students' English grammar achievement. Indonesian Journal of Informatics Education, 2(2), 69-76. %vi%i.24382. DOI:https://doi.org/10.20961/ijie.v
  47. Wigfield, A., & Cambria, J. (2010). Students' achievement values, goal orientations, and interests: Definitions, development, and relations to achievement outcomes. Developmental Review, 30(1), 1-35. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2009.12.001
  48. Williams, B., & Reddy, P. (2016). Does peer-assisted learning improve academic performance? A scoping review. Nurse Education Today, 42, 23-29. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2016.03.024
  49. Winder, R., Kathpalia, S. S., & Koo, S. L. (2016). Writing centre tutoring sessions: Addressing students' concerns. Educational Studies, 42(4), 1-17. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2016.1193476
  50. Won, J., Change, H., & Kang, M.K. (2017). The effect of peer learning on college EFL learners in Korea. Information, 20(12), 8309-8316.

Arquivos suplementares

Arquivos suplementares
Ação
1. JATS XML
Baixar


Creative Commons License
Este artigo é disponível sob a Licença Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional.