Email this article 
Species composition of weeds in various crop rotations of the Mari El Republic
- Authors: Zamyatin S.A.1, Maksimova R.B.1
-
Affiliations:
- Federal Agricuctural Research Center of the North-East named N.V. Rudnitsky
- Issue: No 4 (2024)
- Pages: 46-49
- Section: Crop Production and Selection
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/2500-2082/article/view/262799
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S2500208224040079
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/xlsbgk
- ID: 262799
Cite item
Open Access
Access granted
Abstract
The article presents the results of long-term experiments to determine the species composition of weed vegetation, the dynamics of weeds on crops in various crop rotations is established. In order to develop rational measures to control weeds, their species and quantitative composition were studied. The experiment was carried out on the field of the Mari Research Institute of Agricultural Sciences, a branch of the Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of the North–East, founded in 1996 and 1998. The duration is four rotations of six–field crop rotations. The soil is sod–podzolic medium loamy. The purpose of the work is to determine the species composition of weeds in crop rotations, to identify the influence of crop rotations, to trace the dynamics of crop contamination. The share of juvenile weeds accounts for 26 species, perennial – 10. The minimum amount of weed vegetation was noted in the III fruit–bearing crop rotation (average over the years – 49.55 pcs/m2), the maximum – in the grassy (61.15 pcs/m2). According to factor B, in all years of research on juvenile weeds, the lowest
Full Text
About the authors
S. A. Zamyatin
Federal Agricuctural Research Center of the North-East named N.V. Rudnitsky
Email: zamyatin.ser@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3999-9179
PhD in Agricultural Sciences, Mari Agricultural Research Institute
Russian Federation, Ruem, Mari El RepublicR. B. Maksimova
Federal Agricuctural Research Center of the North-East named N.V. Rudnitsky
Author for correspondence.
Email: zamyatin.ser@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0324-8525
Researcher, Mari Agricultural Research Institute
Russian Federation, Ruem, Mari El RepublicReferences
- Azizov Z.M., Arhipov V.V., Imashev I.G. Effektivnost' proizvodstva zerna v sevooborotah zasushlivoj stepi Nizhnego Povolzh'ya // Agrarnyj nauchnyj zhurnal. 2021. № 2. S. 4–8. https://doi.org/10/28983//asj/y2021i2pp4-8
- Borin A.A., Loshchina A.E. Obrabotka pochvy i sornyaki // Zashchita i karantin rastenij. 2016. № 7. S. 36–38.
- Borisova E.E. Vliyanie predshestvennikov na zasorennost’ i urozhajnost’ yarovoj pshenicy // Vestnik NGIEI. 2011. № 2 (3). S. 55–74.
- Vasil’ev I.P., Tulikov A.M., Bazdyrev G.I. Praktikum po zemledeliyu. M: Kolos, 2004. 424 s.
- Dospekhov B.A. Metody polevogo opyta (s osnovami statisticheskoj obrabotki rezul’tatov issledovanij). Izd-e 5-e, dop. i pererab. M.: Agropromizdat, 1985. 351 s.
- Dridiger V.K., Stukalov R.S., Gadzhiumarov R.G. Ekonomicheskaya effektivnost’ sevooborotov pri vozdelyvanii polevyh kul’tur bez obrabotki pochvy // Sel’skohozyajstvennyj zhurnal. 2019. № 4(12). S. 6–12. https://doi.org/10.25930/0372-3054/001.4.12.2019
- Zamyatin S.A., Efimova A.Yu., Maksutkin S.A. Sornye rasteniya polevyh sevooborotov // Agrarnaya nauka Evro-Severo-Vostoka. 2018. T. 66. № 5. S. 98–103. https://doi.org/10.30766/2072-9081.2018.66.5.98-103
- Noskova E.N., Kozlova L.M., Popov F.A. Svetlakova E.V. Vliyanie sposobov obrabotki pochvy i vidov udobrenij na agrofizicheskie svojstva pochvy, zasorennost’ posevov i urozhajnost’ yachmenya // Tavricheskij vestnik agrarnoj nauki. 2022. № 3 (31). S. 148–158. EDN: URZDYV.
- Plaksina V.S., Astashov A.A., Pronudin K.A. Zasorennost’ posevov v korotkorotacionnyh sevooborotah s shirokim assortimentom kul’tur // Uspekhi sovremennogo estestvoznaniya. 2022. № 12. S. 15–20. https://doi.org/10.17513/use. 37944
- Pluzhnikova I.I., Kriushin N.V., Bakulova I.V. Vliyanie protravitelya i mineral’nyh udobrenij na zasoryonnost’ posevov i porazhennost’ boleznyami rastenij konopli posevnoj // Agrarnyj nauchnyj zhurnal. 2021. № 11. S. 42–46. DOI: https:// doi:org/10/28983//asj/y2021i11pp42-46.
- Polevshchikov S.I. Zasorennost’ posevov v specializirovannyh sevooborotah i pri monokul’ture // Saharnaya svekla. 2006. № 1. S.32–34.
- Rendov N.A., Nekrasova E.V., Mozyleva S.I., Lutchenkova A.A. Effektivnost’ zernoparovogo sevooborota s chistym himicheskim parom // Vestnik Omskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universitieta. 2020. № 1 (37). S. 60–65.
- Savel’ev V.A. Sornye rasteniya i mery bor’by s nimi. Uchebnoe posobie. SPb.: Lan’, 2022. 296 s.
- Tul’kubaeva S.A., Tulaev Yu.V., Somova S.V., Vyhodcev V.A. Vliyanie polevyh sevooborotov na zasorennost’ posevov v usloviyah Kostanajskoj oblasti // Agrarnyj nauchnyj zhurnal. 2023. № 2. S. 67–74. https://doi.org/10.28983/asj/u2022i2rr67-74
Supplementary files
